Another sequence is proposed
An order different from the current sequence is presented for comparison.
Limit : This proposal is not automatically the best possible sequence or a change already applied.
Optimization compares or proposes an order based on the available information without automatically imposing a change or guaranteeing a perfect result. This guide helps you compare a proposed sequence with the current order, reread the day’s constraints, and knowingly confirm or keep the schedule.
The current order represents the sequence before any change. A proposal may compare another order when the flow allows it, while route, distance, or duration estimates provide context. Reread the times, periods, addresses, and other available constraints before making a decision. Human adjustment may be necessary, and no proposal should be applied blindly. When a confirmation action is available, reread the proposal before changing the schedule. Depending on the flow, keeping the current order may also be the appropriate decision. A proposal guarantees neither the absolute best order, the shortest route, nor a certain arrival time.
Start by identifying what is actually presented in the comparison.
An order different from the current sequence is presented for comparison.
Limit : This proposal is not automatically the best possible sequence or a change already applied.
The visible comparison keeps the same order or no other sequence is proposed.
Limit : This result does not prove that no calculation was performed or that the order is optimal in every context.
The proposed order appears incompatible with a known time, period, address, or constraint.
Limit : An unusual proposal does not automatically reveal the exact cause; the visible data must be reread.
A proposal becomes easier to interpret when each element is reviewed separately.
The appointment sequence before any confirmed change.
Limit : It does not necessarily represent an optimized sequence.
An alternative order presented for comparison when this function is available.
Limit : It guarantees neither the absolute best order nor the minimum distance.
Route, distance, or duration information displayed when available.
Limit : They may change and guarantee neither future traffic nor a certain arrival time.
Times, periods, addresses, availability, or other elements considered in the flow.
Limit : Their presence, precision, and role may vary.
The order kept or applied after the available comparison and confirmations.
Limit : A proposal does not automatically become the final schedule.
Review only information visible or documented in the relevant flow.
Limit : The presence and level of detail of this information may vary depending on the flow, available functions, and user role.
The scope for comparison depends in part on how the appointment is presented in the schedule.
When an appointment is associated with a period rather than a precise start time, another sequence may be compared within that period if the flow allows it.
Limit : The presence of a period does not guarantee that reordering will be proposed or applicable.
When an appointment has a fixed start time, that time must remain a schedule constraint. A route calculation or comparison may remain available without the appointment being presented as freely movable.
Limit : No free movement, automatic time change, or guaranteed punctuality should be inferred from the proposal alone.
Each step answers a separate question before any new order is applied.
The user selects the date or scheduling context to review.
Limit : Selecting the day does not guarantee that a proposal will be available.
The visible appointments and their location information are reviewed.
Limit : A recognized address or available route does not prove that all data is complete.
Periods, fixed times, and other available constraints are reread.
Limit : Their presence and effect may vary by flow.
Both sequences are reviewed with the visible estimates and constraints.
Limit : A difference in order does not automatically prove a real benefit.
The user may keep the proposal, adjust an available element, or reject the proposal depending on the context.
Limit : Actions, roles, and adjustment options may vary.
When a confirmation action is available, the proposed order may be applied; otherwise, or when the proposal is unsuitable, the current schedule may be kept.
Limit : The presence of a confirmation, how it works, and its effects may vary. No operational improvement or punctuality is guaranteed.
Methodically reread the context before applying a sequence that appears incompatible with the day.
Note : Do not change a time or constraint solely to obtain a different sequence without reviewing the possible consequences. A real check may modify the schedule. No universal simulation mode is guaranteed.
Reread the full schedule and avoid repeating an action that has already changed the order.
Note : A real check or application may modify the schedule. No universal simulation mode is guaranteed.
The guide helps reread a proposal without guaranteeing a particular mathematical, operational, or financial result.
Choose the resource matching the route, booking model, or next stage of the schedule.
Choose the appropriate guide to review an address, fee, route, or optimization.
View the collection →Distinguish an address-recognition issue from a coverage-related result.
Read the guide →Review the applicable rule and available data when a fee is displayed or expected.
Read the guide →Check the visible information before concluding that there is an outage.
Read the guide →Learn how sequences may be compared, adjusted, and applied according to the data, constraints, and available actions.
View the page →Understand the difference between periods and proposed start times.
Read the guide →Learn which elements to reread when appointment modification is available.
Read the guide →Gather useful steps and results before contacting support.
Read the guide →Browse the other available collections and guides.
Visit the Help Centre →Please provide only:
Security instruction : Never send a password, authentication code, key, token, technical secret, unnecessary full address, customer name, unnecessary personal information, or unnecessary detailed information about an employee’s movements.